Author Willis, Justin
Article Title “A valid electoral exercise”? Uganda's 1980 Elections and the Observers’ Dilemma
full text https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041751600058X
Source Comparative studies in society and history. vol. 59, no. 1 (Jan. 2017), p. 211-238
My List
Share
Card Marc
เขตข้อมูลข้อมูล
Call number Article
Journal Title Comparative studies in society and history.
Copy vol. 59, no. 1 (Jan. 2017), p. 211-238
ISSN 0010-4175
Co author Lynch, Gabrielle
Co author Cheeseman, Nic
Brief substance The presence at Uganda's 1980 general elections of a Commonwealth Observer Group might be seen as a seminal moment. This was the first formal international observation of polls in a sovereign African state and the precursor of multiple similar missions that later became routine. Yet the 1980 mission sits uneasily in the history of election observation. The observers endorsed the results despite evidence of malpractice, and Uganda plunged into civil war within months. Internationally, the mission is now either forgotten or treated as an embarrassment. Within Uganda, it has been denounced as part of an outsider conspiracy to foist an unwanted president on an unwilling people. This article argues that the 1980 mission was neither entirely seminal nor an aberration, and that both the elections and observation were driven partly by actors within Uganda rather than simply imposed by outsiders. The availability of UK government records allows us to see the events of 1980 as a particularly clear example of a recurring “observers’ dilemma.” Ideally, elections combine democracy and state-building. They offer people a choice as to who will lead or represent them, and at the same time they assert through performance a crucial distinction between a capable, ordering state and a law-abiding citizenry. Yet these two aspects of elections may be in tension; a poll that offers little or no real choice may still perform “stateness” through substantial, orderly public participation. When that happens in what would now be called a “fragile state,” should international observers denounce the results?
full text https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041751600058X

 
Member Review Librarian Review

  Comments   

    Recently viewed